Comments on: San Onofre Update http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/10/san-onofre-update/ American Association for Nude Recreation Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:30:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Alan http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/10/san-onofre-update/comment-page-1/#comment-543 Alan Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:32:27 +0000 http://blog.aanr.com/?p=388#comment-543 Since the CA Supreme Court chose not to reveiw the matter things seem to be going downhill. I'd like to point out though that once the parks dept. decided Cahill didn't apply to San Onofre they in fact invalidated that policy for the entire state. In the original Cahill Policy there was never any mention about remoteness being a factor however if that were the case San Onofre is a remote isolated section of the beach. The fact is they chose to make an example of one of the most populat nude beaches in that state simply because they could. If we had had the public comment period we would have secured our future in all public beaches in that state. We need to be united in our oppositon to this disgusting abuse of power. An attack on one of us is and attack on all. History shows that putting ones head in the sand is not an effective strategy. Since the CA Supreme Court chose not to reveiw the matter things seem to be going downhill. I’d like to point out though that once the parks dept. decided Cahill didn’t apply to San Onofre they in fact invalidated that policy for the entire state. In the original Cahill Policy there was never any mention about remoteness being a factor however if that were the case San Onofre is a remote isolated section of the beach. The fact is they chose to make an example of one of the most populat nude beaches in that state simply because they could. If we had had the public comment period we would have secured our future in all public beaches in that state. We need to be united in our oppositon to this disgusting abuse of power. An attack on one of us is and attack on all. History shows that putting ones head in the sand is not an effective strategy.

]]> By: BeachUser http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/10/san-onofre-update/comment-page-1/#comment-229 BeachUser Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:07:56 +0000 http://blog.aanr.com/?p=388#comment-229 Why are we getting conflicting information? AANR says Cahill does not apply, and NAC says that it does pending the Supreme Court Decision. Why can't these two organizations communicate to get the simple legal facts straight? Why are we getting conflicting information? AANR says Cahill does not apply, and NAC says that it does pending the Supreme Court Decision.

Why can’t these two organizations communicate to get the simple legal facts straight?

]]> By: Rick http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/10/san-onofre-update/comment-page-1/#comment-202 Rick Sat, 12 Sep 2009 15:37:12 +0000 http://blog.aanr.com/?p=388#comment-202 "the California Appellate Court has ordered the prior order issued by Orange County Superior Court Judge Sheila Fell to enforce Cahill reversed and that a new order be issued." While the above statement may be true on the face of it there is essential information that is intentionally being left out that might elicit a different interpretation of the risks by your readers. AANR should acknowledge the automatic stay of that appellate court order while the issue is being brought before the CA Supreme Court. Otherwise AANR could rightly be accused of blind-siding the efforts of the Friends of San Onofre and TNS . . . whatever they think of the merits of said efforts. “the California Appellate Court has ordered the prior order issued by Orange County Superior Court Judge Sheila Fell to enforce Cahill reversed and that a new order be issued.”

While the above statement may be true on the face of it there is essential information that is intentionally being left out that might elicit a different interpretation of the risks by your readers. AANR should acknowledge the automatic stay of that appellate court order while the issue is being brought before the CA Supreme Court. Otherwise AANR could rightly be accused of blind-siding the efforts of the Friends of San Onofre and TNS . . . whatever they think of the merits of said efforts.

]]> By: Thomas Painter http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/10/san-onofre-update/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Thomas Painter Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:25:52 +0000 http://blog.aanr.com/?p=388#comment-198 My question is: "What are you actually doing about this besides 'on-going discussions'?" I don't think just talking will accomplish anything. One would have thought that having a european governor would simplify things for nudists but apparently not My question is: “What are you actually doing about this besides ‘on-going discussions’?” I don’t think just talking will accomplish anything. One would have thought that having a european governor would simplify things for nudists but apparently not

]]>