<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Clarification Regarding Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/03/a-clarification-regarding-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/03/a-clarification-regarding-advertising/</link>
	<description>American Association for Nude Recreation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/03/a-clarification-regarding-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aanr.com/?p=379#comment-159</guid>
		<description>These ads risk putting good AANR members in the same bad position as the unfortunate seller who wants out of a sex resort.  

I appreciate AANR wanting to help those folks, but this is not the way. Surely there are plenty of ways for them to advertise in publications catering to people who want to live in a place like that. AANR is the wrong audience for these ads.

At the very, very least, a clear, bold disclaimer should be included with ads from places like these resorts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These ads risk putting good AANR members in the same bad position as the unfortunate seller who wants out of a sex resort.  </p>
<p>I appreciate AANR wanting to help those folks, but this is not the way. Surely there are plenty of ways for them to advertise in publications catering to people who want to live in a place like that. AANR is the wrong audience for these ads.</p>
<p>At the very, very least, a clear, bold disclaimer should be included with ads from places like these resorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred W. Van Nest</title>
		<link>http://blog.aanr.com/2009/09/03/a-clarification-regarding-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred W. Van Nest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.aanr.com/?p=379#comment-146</guid>
		<description>I understand the ad was paid for by an indivual (probably an AANR member) and not the resort itself. Still anyone who is not aware of the recent changes at PL could easily assume that they were renting at an AANR club and expect a AANR family-type  experience. They could be very disappointed and question AANR&#039;s credibility for leading them to a resort that AANR knows does not live up to AANR standards.

Also, why should AANR members (and maybe media outlets) consider AANR to be a credible voice when it accepts advertising (without any disclaimer)for a resort that clearly violates AANR standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the ad was paid for by an indivual (probably an AANR member) and not the resort itself. Still anyone who is not aware of the recent changes at PL could easily assume that they were renting at an AANR club and expect a AANR family-type  experience. They could be very disappointed and question AANR&#8217;s credibility for leading them to a resort that AANR knows does not live up to AANR standards.</p>
<p>Also, why should AANR members (and maybe media outlets) consider AANR to be a credible voice when it accepts advertising (without any disclaimer)for a resort that clearly violates AANR standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
